FAILING FREEDOMS: Big Sis’ Shockingly Dirty Secrets Go Public as Universities Become Political Dumping Grounds

WND RADIO

‘There’s just something really weird that happened under Janet Napolitano’

Published: 23 hours ago

Democrats and Republicans largely heaped praise upon Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano after she announced she would resign her post later in the year, but a longtime constitutional attorney says there is not much to applaud – especially for anyone concerned about preserving freedom and limiting government intrusion in their lives.

“What the Department of Homeland Security became under Janet Napolitano is this monstrous surveillance and very intimidating group,” said Rutherford Institute President John Whitehead, a constitutional attorney for the past 40 years and author of “A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State.”

http://player.ooyala.com/player.js?width=500&deepLinkEmbedCode=dmN3RpZDqfZN-fRpPVZN6w5vZjr416S8&embedCode=dmN3RpZDqfZN-fRpPVZN6w5vZjr416S8&height=337&video_pcode=9kcm06PtVGNZkFkXR2898mHnBha_

“I think originally there were some good intentions with the Department of Homeland Security, but what happened under President Obama is that it accelerated rapidly,” Whitehead told WND. “I criticized George Bush’s policies. Under President Obama, we’re zooming.”

Whitehead said the Napolitano legacy of reducing freedom is evident across the board, starting in early 2009 when the department issued a report listing returning soldiers as one of the greatest threats to American security.janetnapolantio

“Another program Napolitano set up is Operation Vigilant Eagle, which is a surveillance system done on all returning veterans from overseas, where they watch Facebook posts, text messages, emails of returning veterans to see if they’re going to be disgruntled,” Whitehead said. “There are quite a few disgruntled veterans. In fact, one that we helped just filed a major lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security.”

“They arrived one day at his door, arrested him and actually put him in a mental institution for his Facebook posts criticizing the government. We got him out and then we sued the government,” Whitehead said.

Another outrage, according to Whitehead, is the harassment of Americans living on or somewhat near our national borders with Mexico and Canada. He said law-abiding citizens have been forced to hand over their laptops while the government officials download the information. The Rutherford Institute has also received reports of Americans being removed from their cars and searched without probable cause.

These allegations, and criticism of drone use near the borders, come as Congress hotly debate immigration reform legislation. Whitehead said the problems he’s talking about have nothing to do with border security.

“The people coming over from Mexico are not coming over at checkpoints. Incredibly stupid, and that’s where a lot of emphasis has been placed,” Whitehead said. “Obviously, they’re not focused in the right direction. They put drones on the border but the drones obviously have not been very effective. In fact, what we found our about those drones now, on the Canadian border, turned the drones in. They’re flying inland, photographing and watching what American citizens are doing and surveillance on American towns.”

Whitehead said that sort of activity will only get more common and more intrusive until the American people stand up and refuse to accept what he considers a major infringement on our constitutional liberties.

“Drones are coming in 2015. They’re going to be awesome. They’ll have scanning devices, rubber bullets, sound cannons. They can look through the walls of your home,” Whitehead said. “They’re just going to bypass the Fourth Amendment, and they already are doing that.”

A change at the top of DHS doesn’t give Whitehead any hope that the government will rein in its activities. He says potential replacements, like New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, will likely be no different from Napolitano.

Janet Napolitano

For UC president, why Janet Napolitano?

It’s been nearly a week since University of California regents abruptly announced that Homeland Security czar Janet Napolitano would be the next president of the UC system, and we’re still waiting for answers to two pressing questions.

• Why did regents have such a secretive search process? This is not a minor decision. Public input should have been seen as a must.

• Why Napolitano?

She has no past connections to UC. She is a lawyer without a background in academia or any history as a scholar. She is not a superstar fundraiser, as university presidents are increasingly expected to be.

And if Napolitano was chosen for her supposed skills as a manager, we wonder what that view is based on. Homeland Security is not remotely considered a well-run agency. It was stitched together from more than 20 existing agencies after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and has been decried for years as bloated, clunky and secretive by a bipartisan array of critics. In December, it was labeled the worst large agency to work for in the federal government after a comprehensive independent survey.

Homeland Security needed a reformer. So does UC as it deals with budget headaches, unfunded retirement liabilities and the threat/opportunity posed by the rise of online education. We hope Napolitano rises to the occasion — but our hopes aren’t particularly high.

Petraeus cuts salary for CUNY gig to $1 a year

Ray Locker, USA TODAY 1:14 p.m. EDT July 16, 2013

Former CIA director and four-star general David Petraeus has cut his salary for a City University of New York teaching gig to $1 a year down from the $200,000 he was originally set to receive for the three-hour-a-week course,The New York Timesreported.

The salary cut follows a wave of criticism of both Petraeus and the university following the initial revelation of Petraeus’ salary in the news website Gawker.

Petraeus, who resigned last November from the CIA following the revelations of an FBI investigation that revealed he was having an affair with his biographer, had planned on teaching a seminar called “Are We on the Threshold of the North American Decade.”

STORY: FBI investigation of Petraeus continues

According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by Gawker, Petraeus would have received the $200,000 salary through a gift to CUNY from an outside donor. Gawker cited one e-mail in which Petraeus told CUNY dean Ann Kirschner that the University of Southern California was paying him more money for teaching a class there, too.

The former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan is also a consultant for the Wall Street investment firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. Last month, Team Rubicon, a public-service venture involving veterans, announced that Petraeus had agreed to join its board of advisers.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: